I'd like some help in understanding it ... because on the one hand, I'm always open to learning better ways. But on the other hand, it seems like - from what I've been reading in these other threads - MS is not clearly explained or (for some reason) easy to understand for more than a few people, and it seems it takes quite a while to understand it let alone succeed with it. And of course, there are quite a number of related expenses (budget programs, traffic generating systems, black-belt Ninja courses and various memberships) to spend a lot of money on along the way.
According to what (little) I understand of MS, it seems like instead of just offering someone my MLM program straightaway, I should first become their "friend" by calling them up, saying "Hi!" to them and - after listening to what they're looking for - offering them MS. And then if they buy, I can assume that we're "friends" and then offer them my MLM program - which they'll be more open to doing because A) we're "friends" now, and B) they've purchased something (MS) which they perceive as having valuable content.
To follow that reasoning and play Devil's Advocate: Wouldn't it be even more effective if, before I befriend them with MS, I first offer them still another product with perceived value, and then offer them MS, and then offer them my MLM program?
And I can't help but wonder, Do biz op seekers really believe that someone marketing on the Internet is truly interested in being "friends", or will they simply see it as conditional "friendship", thinly veiling the hidden agenda of selling them something (whether MS or my program)?
It seems like the MS approach assumes that my MLM program has no perceived value - or at least not as much as MS does - and that people are looking to become my friend in order to buy some other product first.
Why couldn't I be friendly when talking with them, listening to what they are looking for, and sharing with them what my MLM program has to offer (in the context of who they are and what they're looking for)?
And if, as I've read in countless threads on these forums, so many MS people end up with "leads" who are responding to "MS, the Better Mousetrap of Lead Generating Systems" and can't figure out how to convert them, how readily do they really put aside the product or program they want the better-mousetrap leads for and join me in mine? I mean, some will, of course, but then again, won't some join me in my program anyway - without buying MS first?
Like I said, I don't get it. Perhaps it's like a joke: either you get it or you don't. (I hope not.) But it seems odd that it has to be so terribly subjective, if not border-line metaphysical.
Perhaps I should just bow to the genius of Mike Dillard's marketing strategy: getting 1,000s of people to sell their prospects his products... and buy into his various membership programs ... before attempting to offer them yours. If nothing else, I should be able to learn from someone capable of that marketing genius.
I guess what I'm stuck on is, how - exactly - does my selling his product first really make it easier to sell my product (afterward)?
And like more than one person has asked in these various threads: How - exactly - do you convert the MS leads ... how do you inspire them to join you in your program, instead of using MS to attract leads for their own product or program.
I'm afraid the answer is going to be, buy MS.
Thanks, in advance, for your offerings.
Richard



